Don't zoo animals like Tigers have it a lot easier in life by living in a zoo where they have food provided

for them on a regular basis, water to drink, plenty of room to roam and Tiger friends to play with, as opposed to the wild, where every day is a struggle to survive. I have read some reactions on the net from people who are anti-zoo, etc, and since the San Fran Zoo incident a few days ago where Tatiana the Tiger escaped and killed one guy and mauled 2 others, some anti-zoo nuts were saying that the Tiger would've been better off if she was in the wild. Oh really? How do they know that? In the wild, it's survival of the fittest, the Tiger might have been eating as a child. So, the question is, don't you think that pets have it better in life in zoos or in the wild? I agree that fish probably shouldn't be in aquariums, and perhaps birds shouldn't be caged, but everything else is ok.